12 MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTED $76 TO MAKE THIS ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS FOR EVERYONE! THANK YOU
Introduction: Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal death in Kenya, yet limited access to timely blood transfusions remains a persistent challenge. Understanding how maternal deaths relate to blood availability is critical to improving outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Objectives: To (1) identify clinical and systemic factors associated with hemorrhagic versus non-hemorrhagic maternal deaths, and (2) evaluate the impact of hospital-based blood bank implementation on blood availability and maternal mortality.
Methodology: We conducted two retrospective analyses at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital, Kenya (January 1, 2019–June 30, 2022): a case-control study comparing maternal deaths due to obstetric hemorrhage (cases) versus non-hemorrhagic causes (controls) using univariate and multivariable logistic regression (p < 0.10 inclusion threshold, adjusted for age and parity); and a repeated cross-sectional study comparing monthly blood units dispatched to the maternity ward, transfusion rates, and maternal mortality before and after implementation of a hospital-based blood bank (June 2020) using Wilcoxon rank-sum exact tests. Poisson regression, adjusting for monthly live births, modeled the association between blood units and hemorrhagic deaths.
Results: Among 90 maternal deaths, 33 (36.7%) were due to obstetric hemorrhage. In the case–control analysis, lack of blood products was associated with nearly 20-fold higher odds of hemorrhagic death (OR 19.91, 95% CI 2.23–177.97, p = 0.01). In the repeated cross-sectional analysis, blood availability after development of a local blood bank did not significantly change monthly hemorrhagic deaths (mean ± SD: 1.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.0 ± 1.0, p = 0.22) or blood units dispatched to the maternity ward (88 ± 16 vs. 87 ± 16, p > 0.99). However, each additional blood unit delivered was associated with a 5% lower incidence rate of hemorrhagic death (IRR 0.95, p = 0.07).
Conclusion: Lack of blood availability is associated with hemorrhagic deaths, underscoring the need for robust, locally adaptive blood systems and strategies to address delays in care-seeking in obstetric emergencies.
In 2017, an estimated 295,000 women died globally of maternity-related causes [1], with over half of these deaths in sub-Saharan Africa [2]. Obstetric hemorrhage remains a major contributor to maternal mortality worldwide, responsible for 34% of maternal deaths in Africa, with over 80% occurring in the postpartum period [3–5]. In Kenya, the estimated Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) is 342 per 100,000 live births, which fails to reach the national target MMR of 147 [6,7]. Obstetric hemorrhage accounts for 40% of maternal deaths in Kenya [8,9], and 91% of these deaths are associated with suboptimal care, such as delays in timely intervention [8]. A recent multicenter study identified significant gaps in risk assessment, prevention, identification, and management of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following vaginal deliveries in Kenyan hospitals, including inadequate adherence to postpartum monitoring guidelines and delays in initiating treatment [10].
Rapid access to blood products is critical to reducing the risk of mortality from hemorrhagic shock, yet geographic and logistical challenges and blood shortages can hinder timely transfusion [11,12]. A 2018 multicenter study in 54 referral hospitals across Kenya identified that only 67% of obstetric patients with antepartum hemorrhage who had a clinical indication for a transfusion received the needed blood products [13]. These existing supply challenges predated more recent strains on Kenya’s blood programs. In 2019, the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) withdrew financial support from the Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority, reducing the operational capacities of regional and satellite blood centers [14]. In the first year of the COVID-19 global pandemic, Kenya faced a significant donor shortage, meeting only 16% of blood demand in 2020 [15,16]. The cessation of World Bank funding for Kenya’s blood programs in 2025 threatens to further strain the blood system, with the Ministry of Health warning that national transfusion services could be severely disrupted without urgent intervention [17].
High maternal anemia rates in Kenya (26.2-40.3%) accentuate the importance of reliable blood systems, as anemia is correlated to blood loss, death, and near miss in labor and postpartum, and parturients with anemia are at a greater risk of PPH and adverse outcomes [18–21]. Additional risk factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage include grand multiparity, prior PPH, Cesarean delivery, prolonged labor, and non-administration of uterotonics[9].
While blood shortages have been linked to maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, research on their impact on hemorrhagic deaths at the point of care in low-resource settings remains limited [11,22,23]. We examined blood availability and obstetric hemorrhage-related mortality at a national referral hospital in Kenya, aiming to (1) identify clinical and systemic factors associated with hemorrhagic versus non-hemorrhagic maternal deaths, and (2) assess whether implementation of a hospital-based blood bank affected blood availability and maternal mortality.
Study Setting
The study was conducted at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital, an 838-bed national referral facility in Kenya’s Rift Valley Province serving 2.1 million people and averaging over 12,000 live births annually. Blood products are supplied by the regional blood center and, since June 2020, by the hospital’s own blood bank. The study period was January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. We conducted two complementary analyses within the same dataset: a patient-level case-control study and a hospital-level repeated cross-sectional study, to capture both individual risk factors and system-wide patterns in blood supply and maternal mortality (Figure 1).
Data Sources
This study received ethical approval from the Egerton University Ethics Review Committee. With permissions from the hospital blood transfusion and performance improvement committees, we reviewed de-identified retrospective data from four sources: 1) Maternal Death Review forms (MDRs), 2) Maternal Death Notification forms (MDNFs), 3) District Health Information System (DHIS) electronic register, and 4) blood transfusion crossmatch register. Records were examined as they related to the blood continuum. Extracted variables from MDR and MDNFs included age, parity, referral status, parturition status on admission, transfusion status, cause of death, and contributory factors, including documentation of insufficient blood products. Blood transfusion registers provided monthly blood products dispatched to the maternity ward, and live birth counts were obtained from the DHIS register. All data were de-identified prior to analysis and handled confidentially. Access to raw data was restricted to study investigators, and files were stored securely in accordance with hospital and Ministry of Health confidentiality protocols.
Definitions
Maternal death was defined per WHO criteria as death from any cause related to or aggravated by pregnancy or its management (excluding accidental/incidental causes) during pregnancy or within 42 days of termination [24]. Obstetric deaths were classified as direct or indirect [24]. Hemorrhagic deaths included those from antepartum hemorrhage, intrapartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, ectopic pregnancy, or uterine rupture, defined according to WHO guidelines [25,26]. Deaths from other causes or with no indication of hemorrhage were classified as non-hemorrhagic. Cases labeled as “indirect primary cause” or “unconfirmed non-hemorrhagic cause” included both WHO-defined indirect causes (e.g., anemia, HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular disease) and suspected but unconfirmed direct causes without documented hemorrhage (e.g., pulmonary embolism, amniotic fluid embolism). Contributory factors were abstracted from clinician-completed MDR and MDNF forms, based on clinical documentation and multidisciplinary review conclusions. These forms identify individual-, community-, and health system–level contributors to maternal death (Table 4).
Bias Mitigation
To minimize bias, we cross-verified information across multiple data sources, applied standardized definitions for exposures and outcomes, and restricted statistical analyses to variables with ≥80% completeness in maternal death records.
Case-Control Retrospective Study
We included all maternal deaths documented at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022. Cases were deaths due to obstetric hemorrhage; controls were deaths from non-hemorrhagic causes. The analysis compared clinical and systemic factors associated with hemorrhagic death. Univariate logistic regression identified candidate variables (p<0.10), which were entered into a multiple logistic regression model adjusting for age and parity. Detectable effect sizes were calculated post-hoc using observed exposure proportions and logistic regression parameters, with α=0.05.
Repeated Cross-Sectional Study
We conducted a repeated cross-sectional analysis of monthly hospital-level data collected at three-month intervals from May 1, 2019, to May 31, 2022. All available records on maternal deaths, transfusions, live births, and blood product dispatches to the maternity ward were included. The primary outcome was the monthly count of hemorrhagic maternal deaths. Secondary outcomes included monthly blood units dispatched to the maternity ward, total maternal deaths, and live births. We compared pre- and post-implementation periods relative to the June 2020 launch of the hospital-based blood bank. Wilcoxon rank-sum exact tests were used for pre–post comparisons due to small sample size and non-normality. Poisson regression was used to model the association between monthly hemorrhagic deaths and blood units dispatched, adjusting for the number of live births. Post-hoc power analyses were conducted using observed means and standard deviations for key variables.
General Analytic Information
Analyses were performed in Stata/SE 16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation (if normally distributed) or median [range] (if not). Categorical variables are reported as frequencies and percentages. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. This study followed the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.
Case-Control Retrospective Study
Maternal Mortality
Between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022, there were 90 maternal deaths and 42,876 live births at or before arrival to Nakuru Level 6 Hospital, corresponding to a maternal mortality ratio of 210 ± 157 deaths per 100,000 live births. The mean age at death was 28.3 ± 5.8 years, and the median parity was 2 [range 0–8]. Over half of patients (47/88, 53.4%) were referred from another facility. The most common parturition status on admission was antenatal (33/77, 42.9%), followed by intrapartum (21/77, 27.3%) and postpartum (17/77, 22.1%); 7.8% (6/77) were admitted for abortion or ectopic pregnancy.
The three most common direct causes of death were obstetric hemorrhage (33/90, 36.7%), followed by eclampsia/preeclampsia (20/90, 22.2%) and infection or sepsis (17/90, 18.9%). Common indirect causes included anemia (18/90, 20.0%), cardiovascular disease (15/90, 16.7%), and respiratory disease (10/90, 11.1%). Deaths from indirect causes or unconfirmed direct causes without documented hemorrhage accounted for one-quarter of cases (23/90, 25.6%) and were classified as non-hemorrhagic.
Half of the cohort (39/80, 48.8%) received at least one blood transfusion during hospital admission. Contributory factors were documented in 85.6% (77/90) of cases; the most common were failure to recognize danger signs of pregnancy (28/77, 36.4%), resource-constrained care at Nakuru Hospital (22/77, 28.6%), and missed antenatal care (19/77, 24.6%) (Table 4).
Univariate Regression
In univariate analyses, receipt of a blood transfusion was associated with increased odds of hemorrhagic death (OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.57–10.96, p = 0.004) (Table 2). Lack of blood products, a clinician-documented contributory factor, increased the odds more than eightfold (OR 8.33, 95% CI 2.05–33.83, p = 0.003). Delays or miscommunication between referring facilities and Nakuru Hospital had a threefold increased odds of hemorrhagic death, though this did not reach statistical significance (OR 3.50, 95% CI 0.92–13.24, p = 0.065). Patient-level barriers, such as delays in seeking care or failure to recognize danger signs, were inversely associated with hemorrhagic death (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.003–0.44, p = 0.009; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11–0.89, p = 0.03, respectively), indicating higher odds of non-hemorrhagic death in these groups.
No significant associations were found between hemorrhagic death and age, parity, referral status, anemia, missed antenatal care, resource constraints at the referring facility or Nakuru Hospital, lack of patient information, poverty, or cultural or religious barriers.
Multiple Logistic Regression
After adjusting for age, parity, and significant univariate variables, lack of blood products remained associated with hemorrhagic death (OR 19.91, 95% CI 2.23–177.97, p = 0.007). Delay in seeking healthcare was associated with higher odds of non-hemorrhagic death (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.003–0.44, p = 0.009). A post-hoc power calculation using observed exposure proportions for lack of blood products indicated approximately 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 6.6 at α = 0.05; smaller effects were likely underpowered.
Repeated Cross-Sectional Study
Blood availability after implementation of the hospital-based blood bank in June 2020 did not show significant changes in monthly blood units dispatched to the maternity ward (88 ± 16 vs. 87 ± 16 units/month, p > 0.99) or in monthly hemorrhagic maternal deaths (1.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.0 ± 1.0, p = 0.22) when comparing pre- and post-implementation periods (Table 3, Figure 2; full dataset in Table 5). No significant differences were observed in the mean number of obstetric patients receiving transfusions, total maternal deaths, or live births. Post-hoc power calculations indicated that the study had only 36% power to detect the observed difference in monthly hemorrhagic deaths and 5% power for monthly blood units, suggesting it was underpowered to identify modest pre-post changes.
In Poisson regression, however, each additional blood unit delivered to the maternity ward was associated with a 5% lower incidence rate of hemorrhagic death (IRR 0.95, p = 0.07), although this association did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3).
| N (%) or Mean (SD) | |
| Maternal Deaths | 90 |
| Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000 Live Births) | 210 (157) |
| Age (years) | 28.3 (5.8) |
| Parity (given as Median) | 2 (1) |
| Referred from Outside Medical Center | 47 (53.4) |
| Parturition Status on Admission | |
| Antenatal | 33 (42.9) |
| Intrapartum | 21 (27.3) |
| Postpartum | 17 (22.1) |
| Abortion/ Ectopic Pregnancy | 6 (7.8) |
| Received Blood Transfusion | 39 (48.8) |
| Direct Cause of Death | |
| Peripartum Hemorrhage | 33 (36.7) |
| Eclampsia/ Pre-Eclampsia | 20 (22.2) |
| Pulmonary Embolism | 8 (8.9) |
| Pulmonary Edema | 3 (3.3) |
| Amniotic fluid embolism | 1 (1.1) |
| Ectopic pregnancy | 3 (3.3) |
| Infection, sepsis | 17 (18.9) |
| Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation | 3 (3.3) |
| Abortion | 3 (3.3) |
| Cardiac Arrest | 1 (1.1) |
| Multiorgan failure | 2 (2.2) |
| Other | 1 (1.1) |
| Indirect primary cause of death or unconfirmed, non-hemorrhagic cause of death | 23 (25.6) |
| Indirect Cause of Death | |
| Anemia | 18 (20.0) |
| HIV/AIDS | 9 (10.0) |
| Respiratory Disease | 10 (11.1) |
| Cardiovascular disease | 15 (16.7) |
| Renal disease | 3 (3.3) |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 5 (5.6) |
| Intrauterine Fetal Demise | 4 (4.4) |
| Uterine rupture | 3 (3.3) |
| Other | 7 (7.8) |
- Percentages for direct and indirect causes of death exceed 100% because some deaths had more than one documented direct or indirect cause.
- SD: standard deviation, HIV/AIDS: human immunodeficiency virus/ acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
| Hemorrhagic Deaths (N=33) | Non-Hemorrhagic Deaths (N=56) | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-Value in Univariate Analysis | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-Value in Multiple Regression Analysis | |
| Age | 28 | 27 | 1.02 (0.95, 1.10) | 0.52 | 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) | 0.60 |
| Parity | 2 | 2 | 1.21 (0.92, 1.59) | 0.17 | 1.19 (0.79, 1.80) | 0.40 |
| Referred from Outside Medical Center | 18 (54.5) | 29 (53.7) | 1.20 (0.50, 2.87) | 0.69 | ||
| Received Blood Transfusion | 21 (70.0) | 18 (36.0) | 4.15 (1.57, 10.96) | 0.004 | ||
| Indirect Cause of Death: Anemia | 9 (27.3) | 9 (16.1) | 1.96 (0.69, 5.58) | 0.21 | ||
| Contributory Factors to Mortality | ||||||
| Lack of Blood Products** | 10 (35.7) | 3 (6.3) | 8.33 (2.05, 33.83) | 0.003 | 19.91 (2.23, 177.97) | 0.007 |
| Missed Antenatal Care | 6 (20.7) | 13 (27.1) | 0.70 (0.23, 2.11) | 0.53 | ||
| Failure to Recognize Danger Sign | 6 (20.7) | 22 (45.8) | 0.31 (0.11, 0.89) | 0.03 | 0.67 (0.12, 3.63) | 0.64 |
| Delay in Seeking Healthcare** | 1 (3.4) | 15 (31.3) | 0.08 (0.01, 0.63) | 0.02 | 0.04 (0.003, 0.44) | 0.009 |
| Delay or Miscommunication from Referring Facility | 7 (24.1) | 4 (8.3) | 3.50 (0.92, 13.24) | 0.07 | 2.10 (0.41, 10.79) | 0.38 |
| Resource-Constrained Care at Referring Facility | 4 (13.8) | 6 (12.5) | 1.12 (0.29, 4.36) | 0.87 | ||
| Resource-Constrained Care at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital | 10 (34.5) | 12 (25.0) | 1.58 (0.58, 4.32) | 0.37 | ||
| Poverty | 0 (0) | 2 (4.2) | 1 | N/A | ||
| Cultural or Religious Objections | 0 (0) | 3 (6.3) | 1 | N/A |
- Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed between each variable and the binary outcome of obstetric hemorrhagic death. Variables with a significance level of p≤0.1 in the univariate analyses were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis.
- Significance levels are indicated for multiple logistic regression: *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
| Monthly Data | Before blood bank implementation (monthly mean, N=5, SD) | After blood bank implementation (monthly mean, N=8, SD) | P-value in Wilcoxon rank-sum exact test |
| Number of blood units dispatched to the maternity ward | 88 (16) | 87 (16) | >0.99 |
| Number of patients who received a blood transfusion in the maternity ward | 53 (11) | 53 (11) | >0.99 |
| Number of maternal deaths | 3 (2) | 2 (2) | 0.27 |
| Number of hemorrhagic maternal deaths | 1 (1) | 0 (1) | 0.22 |
| Average number of live births per month | 1070 (116) | 984 (96) | 0.07 |
- SD: standard deviation. The cutoff for pre- and post-blood bank implementation was June 2020. Monthly data was collected at three-month intervals (e.g., May 2019, August 2019, November 2019, February 2020, etc.).
- Significance levels are indicated for the Wilcoxon rank-sum exact test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Our analyses at a Kenyan national referral hospital highlight key associations— most notably, that unavailability of blood products increased the odds of hemorrhagic deaths, and delays in seeking care increased the odds of non-hemorrhagic deaths. Blood bank data showed that lower blood availability correlated with higher hemorrhagic death rates, with fluctuations in supply before and after the hospital blood bank was established in June 2020. To our knowledge, this is the first study in a Kenyan healthcare setting to directly compare risk factors between hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic obstetric deaths. These findings build on a broader understanding of how systemic healthcare challenges contribute to Kenya’s persistently high maternal mortality rate.
We report a hospital-wide maternal mortality rate of 210 per 100,000 live births, aligning with national estimates which range from 36.2 to 510 [6,13,23,27–29]. Outcomes of obstetric complications are strongly affected by delays in accessing timely, life-saving care. According to the Three Delays Model, critical delays occur when seeking care, arriving at a health facility, and receiving adequate care [30]. The third delay— accessing quality care— is a key factor in maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa, often due to insufficient provider training, drug procurement challenges, staff shortages, inadequate equipment, and low staff motivation [9,11,22,27,31]. Prior studies in other countries in sub-Saharan Africa highlight the influence of third delay factors in postpartum hemorrhage deaths, including blood access, interhospital transfers, and lack of obstetric-gynecologic specialists [32].
Our findings further underscore the quantitative relationship between blood availability and hemorrhagic maternal deaths, reinforcing the critical role of robust hospital blood systems. After the hospital-based blood bank was established in June 2020, monthly blood units dispatched to the maternity ward did not substantially change, and there was no statistically significant reduction in hemorrhagic deaths. Post-hoc power calculations showed that the repeated cross-sectional analysis had only 36% power for the observed difference in monthly hemorrhagic deaths and 5% power for monthly blood units, indicating the study was underpowered to detect modest pre–post changes. Poisson regression analysis assessed monthly variability in blood availability across the full study period. This approach revealed that each additional blood unit was associated with a 5% lower incidence rate of hemorrhagic death, suggesting a possible dose-response relationship. While this trend did not reach statistical significance, it may still be clinically meaningful and hypothesis-generating. The persistently limited supply of blood products, the small number of monthly hemorrhagic deaths, and a post-implementation decline in live births likely contributed to the absence of a detectable change in the pre-post comparison. High transfusion rates among non-hemorrhagic deaths may reflect treatment of baseline anemia or unrecognized hemorrhage, particularly given the high prevalence of anemia in the study population. Prior studies in sub-Saharan Africa have identified multiple drivers of blood shortages, including donor scarcity, limited supplies and transport, inefficient recruitment, inappropriate transfusion, cultural barriers, stigma related to HIV status, and insufficient funding for blood services [11, 33, 34]. Future work could examine the longitudinal impact of decentralized hospital-based blood banks across multiple wards and endpoints, as well as contextual factors underlying blood availability trends.
Our secondary findings highlight that first- and second-delay barriers, including failure to recognize danger signs and delay in seeking healthcare, had stronger associations with non-hemorrhagic maternal deaths. This suggests gaps in patient knowledge and responses to complications like pre-eclampsia, infections, and indirect causes of death. Previous studies in Kenya have shown that only two-thirds of antenatal patients know even one danger sign, with most awareness centered on hemorrhagic symptoms rather than signs of other critical conditions (e.g., reduced fetal movement, abnormal vaginal discharge) [35]. Moreover, nearly half of patients lack a clear emergency plan [35]. A recent multicenter study in Nairobi similarly found that deaths from non-hemorrhagic causes (i.e., infection and eclampsia) were often linked to delayed care-seeking [36]. These findings emphasize the importance of educating patients about a broader range of danger signs and supporting them in establishing care plans.
This study has several limitations. As a single-center, retrospective review, it may not represent national trends, and data sources may contain redundant and missing information. Due to incomplete patient records, we could not collect data on clinical characteristics that might increase obstetric risks (e.g., anemia prevalence, estimated blood loss), nor on other key interventions in hemorrhage management (e.g., IV fluids, uterotonics). Furthermore, using the number of blood units dispatched to the maternity ward as a proxy for transfusions may underestimate actual transfusion events, and some deaths classified as non-hemorrhagic may have involved unrecognized hemorrhage. Finally, maternal deaths occurring outside the hospital or without completion of MDR/MDNF forms may be underreported, potentially underestimating the true burden of maternal mortality.
Our case-control analysis found that lack of blood products was significantly associated with hemorrhagic maternal death, while delays in seeking care were more often linked to non-hemorrhagic deaths. In the repeated cross-sectional analysis, implementation of a hospital-based blood bank did not significantly change blood supply or hemorrhagic mortality, likely due to minimal change in monthly blood units and low statistical power. These findings underscore the critical roles of reliable blood availability and timely care-seeking in improving maternal outcomes. Interventions to strengthen blood transfusion systems and expand patient education on obstetric emergency signs are essential in high-volume settings. Further research should evaluate locally adaptive blood bank models and strategies to reduce delays in emergency care access.
We thank our collaborators at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital for their approval of onsite study activities and for supporting data collection and analyses. We thank the Pathways for Innovative Transfusion Systems in Kenya (PITS- Kenya) “Bloodsafe” research program funded by the NHLBI/NIH (Strathmore IRB Approval # SU-IERC0992/21 and University of Pittsburgh IRB approval # STUDY21020040) for providing the infrastructure to conduct research activities. This international research collaboration initiative aims to identify and implement strategies to improve the availability and safety of blood transfusion services in Sub-Saharan Africa. (https://bloodsafe-research.org/)
REFERENCES1. World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization; 2019. Accessed September 15, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/3275952. Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. The Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462-474. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7 [crossref]3. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066-1074. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9 [crossref]4. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323-333. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X [crossref]5. Mclintock C, James AH. Obstetric hemorrhage. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(8):1441-1451. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04398.x [crossref]6. Maternal Mortality Ratio (Modeled estimate, per 100,000 Live Births) – Kenya. The World Bank. Accessed December 13, 2022. https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/46227. Keats EC, Ngugi A, Macharia W, et al. Progress and priorities for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health in Kenya: a Countdown to 2015 country case study. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(8):e782-e795. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30246-2 [crossref]8. Muthigani W, Ameh CA, Godia PM, et al. Saving Mothers Lives 2017: First Confidential Report into Maternal Deaths in Kenya. Published online 20179. Ameh CA, Meka RJ, West F, Dickinson F, Allott H, Godia P. A synthesis of clinical and health system bottlenecks to implementing new WHO postpartum hemorrhage recommendations: Secondary data analysis of the Kenya Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths 2014–2017. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;158(S1):14-22. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14270 [crossref]10. Clarke-Deelder E, Opondo K, Achieng E, et al. Quality of care for postpartum hemorrhage: A direct observation study in referral hospitals in Kenya. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(3):e0001670. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001670 [crossref]11. Bates I, Chapotera G, McKew S, Van Den Broek N. Maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: the contribution of ineffective blood transfusion services. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(11):1331-1339. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01866.x [crossref]12. Gallaher JR, Mulima G, Kopp D, Shores CG, Charles AG. Consequences of centralised blood bank policies in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(2):e131-e132. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30364-3 [crossref]13. Owolabi O, Riley T, Juma K, et al. Incidence of maternal near-miss in Kenya in 2018: findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional study in 54 referral hospitals. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15181. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72144-x [crossref]14. Adepoju P. Blood transfusion in Kenya faces an uncertain future. The Lancet. 2019;394(10203):997-998. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32140-3 [crossref]15. Ensuring Access to Safe Blood in Kenya Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. World Bank. Accessed February 8, 2024. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2022/05/06/ensuring-access-to-safe-blood-in-kenya-enhanced-amid-covid-19-pandemic16. Press Statement on Blood Situation in the Country. Published online 202017. Mumbi L. Kenya’s blood transfusion services face collapse as World Bank’s Sh2.7 billion support ends. The Eastleigh Voice News. March 31, 2025. Accessed April 2, 2025. https://eastleighvoice.co.ke/health/132534/kenyas-blood-transfusion-services-face-collapse-as-world-banks-sh27-billion-support-ends18. Odhiambo JN, Sartorius B. Mapping of anaemia prevalence among pregnant women in Kenya (2016–2019). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):711. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03380-2 [crossref]19. Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women (%) – Kenya. World Bank Open Data. Accessed July 1, 2023. https://data.worldbank.org20. Mansukhani R, Shakur-Still H, Chaudhri R, et al. Maternal anaemia and the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a cohort analysis of data from the WOMAN-2 trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(8):e1249-e1259. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00245-0 [crossref]21. Frass KA. Postpartum hemorrhage is related to the hemoglobin levels at labor: Observational study. Alex J Med. 2015;51(4):333-337. doi:10.1016/j.ajme.2014.12.002 [crossref]22. Thorsen VC, Sundby J, Malata A. Piecing Together the Maternal Death Puzzle through Narratives: The Three Delays Model Revisited. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(12):e52090. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052090 [crossref]23. Muchemi OM, Gichogo AW, Mungai JG, Roka ZG. Trends in health facility based maternal mortality in Central Region, Kenya: 2008-2012. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;23:259. doi:10.11604/pamj.2016.23.259.8262 [crossref]24. Maternal Deaths. World Health Organization. Accessed December 19, 2022. https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/462225. Antepartum Haemorrhage (Green-top Guideline No. 63). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Accessed December 19, 2022. https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/antepartum-haemorrhage-green-top-guideline-no-63/26. Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(5):e106-e149. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14178 [crossref]27. Smith H, Ameh C, Godia P, et al. Implementing Maternal Death Surveillance and Response in Kenya: Incremental Progress and Lessons Learned. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(3):345-354. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00130 [crossref]28. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Published online 201529. World Health Organization, World Bank, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990-2015: Estimates from WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization; 2015. Accessed February 8, 2024. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/19425430. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1982. 1994;38(8):1091-1110. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7 [crossref]31. Knight HE, Self A, Kennedy SH. Why Are Women Dying When They Reach Hospital on Time? A Systematic Review of the ‘Third Delay.’ PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e63846. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063846 [crossref]32. Tort J, Rozenberg P, Traoré M, Fournier P, Dumont A. Factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage maternal death in referral hospitals in Senegal and Mali: a cross-sectional epidemiological survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:235. doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0669-y [crossref]33. Kipkulei J, Buziba N, Mining S. Evaluation of the Clinical Blood Transfusion Practice at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya. Published online September 25, 201934. Asamoah-Akuoko L, Appiah B, Delaney M, M’baya B, Tagny CT, Bates I. The status of blood supply in sub-Saharan Africa: barriers and health impact. The Lancet. 2023;402(10398):274-276. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01164-9 [crossref]35. Mutiso SM, Qureshi Z, Kinuthia J. Birth preparedness among antenatal clients. East Afr Med J. 2008;85(6):275-283. doi:10.4314/eamj.v85i6.9625 [crossref]36. Obare F, Liambila W, Okoro D, Ayisi R, Ochola S. Factors contributing to maternal mortality in relatively resource-endowed urban contexts of developing countries: the case of Nairobi, Kenya. Afr Popul Stud. 2016;30(3). doi:10.11564/30-3-922 [crossref]
| Contributory factors to mortality | Sample size (%)
N=77 |
Checkbox or Free-Text Notes Associated with Contributory Factor |
| Lack of blood products | 13 (16.9) |
|
| Missed antenatal care (ANC) | 19 (24.6) |
|
| Failure to recognize danger signs | 28 (36.4) |
|
| Delay in seeking healthcare | 16 (20.8) |
|
| Delay/ miscommunication from referring facility | 11 (14.3) |
|
| Resource-constrained care at referring facility | 10 (13.0) |
|
| Resource-constrained care at Nakuru Hospital | 22 (28.6) |
|
| Poverty | 2 (2.6) |
|
| Cultural or religious objections | 3 (3.9) |
|
- Contributory factors to death are circumstances or conditions at the personal, family, community, and health system levels that were related to a patient’s death. Information on contributory factors was abstracted from clinician-completed MDR and MDNF forms, based on clinical documentation and multidisciplinary review conclusions.
|
|
Total Units Dispatched to Maternity Ward | Total Maternal Deaths | Hemorrhagic Deaths | Number of Live Births at Nakuru Hospital |
| May 2019 | 107 | 2 | 1 | 1086 |
| August 2019 | 101 | 3 | 1 | 1121 |
| November 2019 | 87 | 2 | 0 | 1150 |
| February 2020 | 71 | 6 | 3 | 1128 |
| May 2020 | 75 | 3 | 1 | 867 |
| August 2020 | 81 | 2 | 1 | 961 |
| November 2020 | 74 | 2 | 0 | 778 |
| February 2021 | 63 | 2 | 1 | 954 |
| May 2021 | 94 | 4 | 0 | 982 |
| August 2021 | 90 | 2 | 1 | 1071 |
| November 2021 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1075 |
| February 2022 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 998 |
| May 2022 | 117 | 4 | 0 | 1051 |
- Monthly number of blood units dispatched to the maternity ward from the hospital laboratory, maternal deaths, obstetric hemorrhagic deaths, and live births occurring at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital over the study period.
The Journal of Global Surgery (ONE) is proud to transparently publish its financial model to determine the ethical publishing cost required to publish one peer reviewed article on the platform. This figure is determined by two principle calculations: the fixed running costs of the platform per article (for example annual web server fees, DOI registration), and the indivudalised stipend payments that each journal distributes to its volunteer staff to administrate, edit and review manuscripts. Each journal may set its own stipend value to the editors, peer reviewers and administrators that support the journal’s activities.
Ultimately, the final article price tag will be known as the community article processing fee (CAPC). Once the article is officially published, the CAPC price tag can be paid in full by anyone (for example the authors, an institution, a philanthropist), or the article fee can be community crowd funded, where any individual can contribute to the CAPC to reduce the price tag for everyone else. Anyone contributing as little as $0.10 will have instant early access to the article, ensuring that even if the article remains locked, anyone in the world will have the opportunity for instant, affordable access to the article. And of course, once the CAPC has been paid in full, the entire community will have open access to the article with no further costs.
|
PLATFORM COST PER ARTICLE1 |
ARTICLE STIPENDS2 |
COMMUNITY ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE |
||
$16 |
+ |
$60 |
= |
$76 |
| Description | Cost ($) |
| Stipend made to peer reviewer for one peer review Note: This is the amount in dollars paid to one peer reviewer, irrespective of whether article is accepted or rejected. *Assumption is that one article will have two independent peer reviews |
10 |
| Stipend made to editor per article undergoing active peer review Note: This is the amount in dollars paid to the editor, irrespective of whether article is accepted or rejected. |
10 |
| Stipend made for administration and type setting per accepted article Using our platform, the automated typesetting process is extremely efficient with instant publication options |
15 |
| Bitcoin Cash payment given to authors to allow them instant access to their own article. | 2 |
| Final journal specific running costs based on manuscript acceptance rate of 70%* *based on estimation |
60 |
Figures last updated: July 27, 2021 at 7:10 pm
Article creation cost: $76
Community payments to date: $76.00
Remaining payments for open access: $0.00
The following payments have been made to help pay for this article:
| User | Amount | Payment method | Date |
| Anonymous | $10.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 12, 2025 at 11:22 am |
| Anonymous | $1.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 12, 2025 at 11:22 am |
| Anonymous | $10.00 | PayPal | October 12, 2025 at 1:36 pm |
| Anonymous | $1.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 12, 2025 at 10:52 pm |
| emergent_reasons | $5.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 13, 2025 at 12:59 am |
| The BCH Podcast | $5.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 13, 2025 at 2:04 am |
| Anonymous | $5.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 13, 2025 at 5:53 am |
| Omar | $4.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 13, 2025 at 12:32 pm |
| devperate | $3.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 13, 2025 at 9:54 pm |
| Anonymous | $20.00 | PayPal | October 13, 2025 at 10:49 pm |
| CashStamps | $5.00 | Bitcoin Cash | October 14, 2025 at 4:09 am |
| Anonymous | $7.00 | PayPal | October 14, 2025 at 5:36 pm |
Cite this article
Select the citation style to generate the format below.
Export citation (includes abstract)
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Number of full article views: 2538
Number of PDF views: 138