Blood Availability and Maternal Mortality from Obstetric Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Case-Control and Cross-Sectional Study in Kenya

Journal Of Global Surgery (ONE), Volume. 2, Issue: 1, pp. 2-12
Blood Availability and Maternal Mortality from Obstetric Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Case-Control and Cross-Sectional Study in Kenya
mad461@pitt.edu
Marisa DelSignore, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, United States
Robert Kamu Kaburu, Strathmore University, Kenya
Alejandro Munoz-Valencia, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, United States
Carolyne Njoki Muiru, Department of Surgery, Egerton University, Kenya
Jana MacLeod, Department of Surgery, Kenyatta University, Kenya
Emmanuel Kiprono Sinei, Margaret Kenyatta Mother Baby Wing, Nakuru Level 6 Hospital, Kenya
Jackline Oluoch-Aridi, Strathmore University, Kenya
Patrick Njuguna, Health Records and Information, Nakuru Level 6 Hospital, Kenya
Peter Robert Oduor, Department of Surgery, Egerton University, Kenya
Nakul P Raykar, Division of Trauma, Burn and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, United States
Juan Carlos PuyanaDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, United States

Eastern Africa Kenya Obstetrics and gynaecology

Keywords: Maternal death, Pregnancy complication, Postpartum hemorrhage, Blood transfusion
SUBMITTED: 26.05.2025 PEER REVIEWED IN: Italy, United States PUBLISHED ONLINE: 12.10.2025
12 MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTED $76 TO MAKE THIS ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS FOR EVERYONE! THANK YOU
ABSTRACT

Introduction: Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal death in Kenya, yet limited access to timely blood transfusions remains a persistent challenge. Understanding how maternal deaths relate to blood availability is critical to improving outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Objectives: To (1) identify clinical and systemic factors associated with hemorrhagic versus non-hemorrhagic maternal deaths, and (2) evaluate the impact of hospital-based blood bank implementation on blood availability and maternal mortality.
Methodology: We conducted two retrospective analyses at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital, Kenya (January 1, 2019–June 30, 2022): a case-control study comparing maternal deaths due to obstetric hemorrhage (cases) versus non-hemorrhagic causes (controls) using univariate and multivariable logistic regression (p < 0.10 inclusion threshold, adjusted for age and parity); and a repeated cross-sectional study comparing monthly blood units dispatched to the maternity ward, transfusion rates, and maternal mortality before and after implementation of a hospital-based blood bank (June 2020) using Wilcoxon rank-sum exact tests. Poisson regression, adjusting for monthly live births, modeled the association between blood units and hemorrhagic deaths.
Results: Among 90 maternal deaths, 33 (36.7%) were due to obstetric hemorrhage. In the case–control analysis, lack of blood products was associated with nearly 20-fold higher odds of hemorrhagic death (OR 19.91, 95% CI 2.23–177.97, p = 0.01). In the repeated cross-sectional analysis, blood availability after development of a local blood bank did not significantly change monthly hemorrhagic deaths (mean ± SD: 1.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.0 ± 1.0, p = 0.22) or blood units dispatched to the maternity ward (88 ± 16 vs. 87 ± 16, p > 0.99). However, each additional blood unit delivered was associated with a 5% lower incidence rate of hemorrhagic death (IRR 0.95, p = 0.07).
Conclusion: Lack of blood availability is associated with hemorrhagic deaths, underscoring the need for robust, locally adaptive blood systems and strategies to address delays in care-seeking in obstetric emergencies.

Introduction

In 2017, an estimated 295,000 women died globally of maternity-related causes [1], with over half of these deaths in sub-Saharan Africa [2]. Obstetric hemorrhage remains a major contributor to maternal mortality worldwide, responsible for 34% of maternal deaths in Africa, with over 80% occurring in the postpartum period [3–5]. In Kenya, the estimated Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) is 342 per 100,000 live births, which fails to reach the national target MMR of 147 [6,7]. Obstetric hemorrhage accounts for 40% of maternal deaths in Kenya [8,9], and 91% of these deaths are associated with suboptimal care, such as delays in timely intervention [8]. A recent multicenter study identified significant gaps in risk assessment, prevention, identification, and management of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following vaginal deliveries in Kenyan hospitals, including inadequate adherence to postpartum monitoring guidelines and delays in initiating treatment [10].

Rapid access to blood products is critical to reducing the risk of mortality from hemorrhagic shock, yet geographic and logistical challenges and blood shortages can hinder timely transfusion [11,12]. A 2018 multicenter study in 54 referral hospitals across Kenya identified that only 67% of obstetric patients with antepartum hemorrhage who had a clinical indication for a transfusion received the needed blood products [13]. These existing supply challenges predated more recent strains on Kenya’s blood programs. In 2019, the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) withdrew financial support from the Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority, reducing the operational capacities of regional and satellite blood centers [14]. In the first year of the COVID-19 global pandemic, Kenya faced a significant donor shortage, meeting only 16% of blood demand in 2020 [15,16]. The cessation of World Bank funding for Kenya’s blood programs in 2025 threatens to further strain the blood system, with the Ministry of Health warning that national transfusion services could be severely disrupted without urgent intervention [17].

High maternal anemia rates in Kenya (26.2-40.3%) accentuate the importance of reliable blood systems, as anemia is correlated to blood loss, death, and near miss in labor and postpartum, and parturients with anemia are at a greater risk of PPH and adverse outcomes [18–21]. Additional risk factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage include grand multiparity, prior PPH, Cesarean delivery, prolonged labor, and non-administration of uterotonics[9].

While blood shortages have been linked to maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, research on their impact on hemorrhagic deaths at the point of care in low-resource settings remains limited [11,22,23]. We examined blood availability and obstetric hemorrhage-related mortality at a national referral hospital in Kenya, aiming to (1) identify clinical and systemic factors associated with hemorrhagic versus non-hemorrhagic maternal deaths, and (2) assess whether implementation of a hospital-based blood bank affected blood availability and maternal mortality.

Methodology

Study Setting

The study was conducted at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital, an 838-bed national referral facility in Kenya’s Rift Valley Province serving 2.1 million people and averaging over 12,000 live births annually. Blood products are supplied by the regional blood center and, since June 2020, by the hospital’s own blood bank. The study period was January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. We conducted two complementary analyses within the same dataset: a patient-level case-control study and a hospital-level repeated cross-sectional study, to capture both individual risk factors and system-wide patterns in blood supply and maternal mortality (Figure 1).

Data Sources

This study received ethical approval from the Egerton University Ethics Review Committee. With permissions from the hospital blood transfusion and performance improvement committees, we reviewed de-identified retrospective data from four sources: 1) Maternal Death Review forms (MDRs), 2) Maternal Death Notification forms (MDNFs), 3) District Health Information System (DHIS) electronic register, and 4) blood transfusion crossmatch register. Records were examined as they related to the blood continuum. Extracted variables from MDR and MDNFs included age, parity, referral status, parturition status on admission, transfusion status, cause of death, and contributory factors, including documentation of insufficient blood products. Blood transfusion registers provided monthly blood products dispatched to the maternity ward, and live birth counts were obtained from the DHIS register. All data were de-identified prior to analysis and handled confidentially. Access to raw data was restricted to study investigators, and files were stored securely in accordance with hospital and Ministry of Health confidentiality protocols.

Definitions

Maternal death was defined per WHO criteria as death from any cause related to or aggravated by pregnancy or its management (excluding accidental/incidental causes) during pregnancy or within 42 days of termination [24]. Obstetric deaths were classified as direct or indirect [24]. Hemorrhagic deaths included those from antepartum hemorrhage, intrapartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, ectopic pregnancy, or uterine rupture, defined according to WHO guidelines [25,26]. Deaths from other causes or with no indication of hemorrhage were classified as non-hemorrhagic. Cases labeled as “indirect primary cause” or “unconfirmed non-hemorrhagic cause” included both WHO-defined indirect causes (e.g., anemia, HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular disease) and suspected but unconfirmed direct causes without documented hemorrhage (e.g., pulmonary embolism, amniotic fluid embolism). Contributory factors were abstracted from clinician-completed MDR and MDNF forms, based on clinical documentation and multidisciplinary review conclusions. These forms identify individual-, community-, and health system–level contributors to maternal death (Table 4).

Bias Mitigation

To minimize bias, we cross-verified information across multiple data sources, applied standardized definitions for exposures and outcomes, and restricted statistical analyses to variables with ≥80% completeness in maternal death records.

Case-Control Retrospective Study

We included all maternal deaths documented at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022. Cases were deaths due to obstetric hemorrhage; controls were deaths from non-hemorrhagic causes. The analysis compared clinical and systemic factors associated with hemorrhagic death. Univariate logistic regression identified candidate variables (p<0.10), which were entered into a multiple logistic regression model adjusting for age and parity. Detectable effect sizes were calculated post-hoc using observed exposure proportions and logistic regression parameters, with α=0.05.

Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

We conducted a repeated cross-sectional analysis of monthly hospital-level data collected at three-month intervals from May 1, 2019, to May 31, 2022. All available records on maternal deaths, transfusions, live births, and blood product dispatches to the maternity ward were included. The primary outcome was the monthly count of hemorrhagic maternal deaths. Secondary outcomes included monthly blood units dispatched to the maternity ward, total maternal deaths, and live births. We compared pre- and post-implementation periods relative to the June 2020 launch of the hospital-based blood bank. Wilcoxon rank-sum exact tests were used for pre–post comparisons due to small sample size and non-normality. Poisson regression was used to model the association between monthly hemorrhagic deaths and blood units dispatched, adjusting for the number of live births. Post-hoc power analyses were conducted using observed means and standard deviations for key variables.

General Analytic Information

Analyses were performed in Stata/SE 16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation (if normally distributed) or median [range] (if not). Categorical variables are reported as frequencies and percentages. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. This study followed the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.

Figure 1: Overview of study design and data analysis
Results

Case-Control Retrospective Study

Maternal Mortality

Between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022, there were 90 maternal deaths and 42,876 live births at or before arrival to Nakuru Level 6 Hospital, corresponding to a maternal mortality ratio of 210 ± 157 deaths per 100,000 live births. The mean age at death was 28.3 ± 5.8 years, and the median parity was 2 [range 0–8]. Over half of patients (47/88, 53.4%) were referred from another facility. The most common parturition status on admission was antenatal (33/77, 42.9%), followed by intrapartum (21/77, 27.3%) and postpartum (17/77, 22.1%); 7.8% (6/77) were admitted for abortion or ectopic pregnancy.

The three most common direct causes of death were obstetric hemorrhage (33/90, 36.7%), followed by eclampsia/preeclampsia (20/90, 22.2%) and infection or sepsis (17/90, 18.9%). Common indirect causes included anemia (18/90, 20.0%), cardiovascular disease (15/90, 16.7%), and respiratory disease (10/90, 11.1%). Deaths from indirect causes or unconfirmed direct causes without documented hemorrhage accounted for one-quarter of cases (23/90, 25.6%) and were classified as non-hemorrhagic.

Half of the cohort (39/80, 48.8%) received at least one blood transfusion during hospital admission. Contributory factors were documented in 85.6% (77/90) of cases; the most common were failure to recognize danger signs of pregnancy (28/77, 36.4%), resource-constrained care at Nakuru Hospital (22/77, 28.6%), and missed antenatal care (19/77, 24.6%) (Table 4).

Univariate Regression

In univariate analyses, receipt of a blood transfusion was associated with increased odds of hemorrhagic death (OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.57–10.96, p = 0.004) (Table 2). Lack of blood products, a clinician-documented contributory factor, increased the odds more than eightfold (OR 8.33, 95% CI 2.05–33.83, p = 0.003). Delays or miscommunication between referring facilities and Nakuru Hospital had a threefold increased odds of hemorrhagic death, though this did not reach statistical significance (OR 3.50, 95% CI 0.92–13.24, p = 0.065). Patient-level barriers, such as delays in seeking care or failure to recognize danger signs, were inversely associated with hemorrhagic death (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.003–0.44, p = 0.009; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11–0.89, p = 0.03, respectively), indicating higher odds of non-hemorrhagic death in these groups.

No significant associations were found between hemorrhagic death and age, parity, referral status, anemia, missed antenatal care, resource constraints at the referring facility or Nakuru Hospital, lack of patient information, poverty, or cultural or religious barriers.

Multiple Logistic Regression

After adjusting for age, parity, and significant univariate variables, lack of blood products remained associated with hemorrhagic death (OR 19.91, 95% CI 2.23–177.97, p = 0.007). Delay in seeking healthcare was associated with higher odds of non-hemorrhagic death (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.003–0.44, p = 0.009). A post-hoc power calculation using observed exposure proportions for lack of blood products indicated approximately 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 6.6 at α = 0.05; smaller effects were likely underpowered.

Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

Blood availability after implementation of the hospital-based blood bank in June 2020 did not show significant changes in monthly blood units dispatched to the maternity ward (88 ± 16 vs. 87 ± 16 units/month, p > 0.99) or in monthly hemorrhagic maternal deaths (1.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.0 ± 1.0, p = 0.22) when comparing pre- and post-implementation periods (Table 3, Figure 2; full dataset in Table 5). No significant differences were observed in the mean number of obstetric patients receiving transfusions, total maternal deaths, or live births. Post-hoc power calculations indicated that the study had only 36% power to detect the observed difference in monthly hemorrhagic deaths and 5% power for monthly blood units, suggesting it was underpowered to identify modest pre-post changes.

In Poisson regression, however, each additional blood unit delivered to the maternity ward was associated with a 5% lower incidence rate of hemorrhagic death (IRR 0.95, p = 0.07), although this association did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3).

Figure 2: Monthly blood unit distribution from hospital laboratory to maternity ward between May 2019 and June 2022. The orange line demarcates the implementation event of the hospital-based blood bank at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital in June 2020, which involved the number of blood units crossmatched in the blood bank and dispatched to the maternity ward per month across the study period.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical features of maternal mortalities at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2022
  N (%) or Mean (SD)
Maternal Deaths 90
Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000 Live Births) 210 (157)
Age (years) 28.3 (5.8)
Parity (given as Median) 2 (1)
Referred from Outside Medical Center 47 (53.4)
Parturition Status on Admission
  Antenatal 33 (42.9)
Intrapartum 21 (27.3)
Postpartum 17 (22.1)
  Abortion/ Ectopic Pregnancy 6 (7.8)
Received Blood Transfusion 39 (48.8)
Direct Cause of Death
Peripartum Hemorrhage 33 (36.7)
Eclampsia/ Pre-Eclampsia 20 (22.2)
Pulmonary Embolism 8 (8.9)
Pulmonary Edema 3 (3.3)
Amniotic fluid embolism 1 (1.1)
Ectopic pregnancy 3 (3.3)
Infection, sepsis 17 (18.9)
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation 3 (3.3)
Abortion 3 (3.3)
Cardiac Arrest 1 (1.1)
Multiorgan failure 2 (2.2)
Other 1 (1.1)
Indirect primary cause of death or unconfirmed, non-hemorrhagic cause of death 23 (25.6)
Indirect Cause of Death
Anemia 18 (20.0)
HIV/AIDS 9 (10.0)
Respiratory Disease 10 (11.1)
Cardiovascular disease 15 (16.7)
Renal disease 3 (3.3)
Diabetes Mellitus 5 (5.6)
Intrauterine Fetal Demise 4 (4.4)
Uterine rupture 3 (3.3)
Other 7 (7.8)
  1. Percentages for direct and indirect causes of death exceed 100% because some deaths had more than one documented direct or indirect cause.
  2. SD: standard deviation, HIV/AIDS: human immunodeficiency virus/ acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Table 2. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis of factors associated with hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic deaths
    Hemorrhagic Deaths (N=33) Non-Hemorrhagic Deaths (N=56) Odds ratio (95% CI) P-Value in Univariate Analysis Odds ratio (95% CI) P-Value in Multiple Regression Analysis
Age 28 27 1.02 (0.95, 1.10) 0.52 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) 0.60
Parity 2 2 1.21 (0.92, 1.59) 0.17 1.19 (0.79, 1.80) 0.40
Referred from Outside Medical Center 18 (54.5) 29 (53.7) 1.20 (0.50, 2.87) 0.69    
Received Blood Transfusion 21 (70.0) 18 (36.0) 4.15 (1.57, 10.96) 0.004    
Indirect Cause of Death: Anemia 9 (27.3) 9 (16.1) 1.96 (0.69, 5.58) 0.21    
Contributory Factors to Mortality            
Lack of Blood Products** 10 (35.7) 3 (6.3) 8.33 (2.05, 33.83) 0.003 19.91 (2.23, 177.97) 0.007
Missed Antenatal Care 6 (20.7) 13 (27.1) 0.70 (0.23, 2.11) 0.53    
Failure to Recognize Danger Sign 6 (20.7) 22 (45.8) 0.31 (0.11, 0.89) 0.03 0.67 (0.12, 3.63) 0.64
Delay in Seeking Healthcare** 1 (3.4) 15 (31.3) 0.08 (0.01, 0.63) 0.02 0.04 (0.003, 0.44) 0.009
Delay or Miscommunication from Referring Facility 7 (24.1) 4 (8.3) 3.50 (0.92, 13.24) 0.07 2.10 (0.41, 10.79) 0.38
Resource-Constrained Care at Referring Facility 4 (13.8) 6 (12.5) 1.12 (0.29, 4.36) 0.87    
Resource-Constrained Care at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital 10 (34.5) 12 (25.0) 1.58 (0.58, 4.32) 0.37    
Poverty 0 (0) 2 (4.2) 1 N/A    
Cultural or Religious Objections 0 (0) 3 (6.3) 1 N/A    
  1. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed between each variable and the binary outcome of obstetric hemorrhagic death. Variables with a significance level of p≤0.1 in the univariate analyses were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis.
  2. Significance levels are indicated for multiple logistic regression: *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Table 3. Comparison of monthly blood output and health outcomes before and after the implementation of a hospital-based blood bank in June 2020
Monthly Data Before blood bank implementation (monthly mean, N=5, SD) After blood bank implementation (monthly mean, N=8, SD) P-value  in Wilcoxon rank-sum exact test
Number of blood units dispatched to the maternity ward 88 (16) 87 (16) >0.99
Number of patients who received a blood transfusion in the maternity ward 53 (11) 53 (11) >0.99
Number of maternal deaths 3 (2) 2 (2) 0.27
Number of hemorrhagic maternal deaths 1 (1) 0 (1) 0.22
Average number of live births per month 1070 (116) 984 (96) 0.07
  1. SD: standard deviation. The cutoff for pre- and post-blood bank implementation was June 2020. Monthly data was collected at three-month intervals (e.g., May 2019, August 2019, November 2019, February 2020, etc.).
  2. Significance levels are indicated for the Wilcoxon rank-sum exact test: *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Figure 3: Obstetric hemorrhagic deaths as a function of blood units dispatched to the maternity ward. Poisson regression model of monthly hemorrhagic deaths in the maternity ward as a function of total blood units dispatched to the maternity ward, adjusted for a fixed number of monthly live births ± 1 SD.
Discussion

Our analyses at a Kenyan national referral hospital highlight key associations— most notably, that unavailability of blood products increased the odds of hemorrhagic deaths, and delays in seeking care increased the odds of non-hemorrhagic deaths. Blood bank data showed that lower blood availability correlated with higher hemorrhagic death rates, with fluctuations in supply before and after the hospital blood bank was established in June 2020. To our knowledge, this is the first study in a Kenyan healthcare setting to directly compare risk factors between hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic obstetric deaths. These findings build on a broader understanding of how systemic healthcare challenges contribute to Kenya’s persistently high maternal mortality rate.

We report a hospital-wide maternal mortality rate of 210 per 100,000 live births, aligning with national estimates which range from 36.2 to 510 [6,13,23,27–29]. Outcomes of obstetric complications are strongly affected by delays in accessing timely, life-saving care. According to the Three Delays Model, critical delays occur when seeking care, arriving at a health facility, and receiving adequate care [30]. The third delay— accessing quality care— is a key factor in maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa, often due to insufficient provider training, drug procurement challenges, staff shortages, inadequate equipment, and low staff motivation [9,11,22,27,31]. Prior studies in other countries in sub-Saharan Africa highlight the influence of third delay factors in postpartum hemorrhage deaths, including blood access, interhospital transfers, and lack of obstetric-gynecologic specialists [32].

Our findings further underscore the quantitative relationship between blood availability and hemorrhagic maternal deaths, reinforcing the critical role of robust hospital blood systems. After the hospital-based blood bank was established in June 2020, monthly blood units dispatched to the maternity ward did not substantially change, and there was no statistically significant reduction in hemorrhagic deaths. Post-hoc power calculations showed that the repeated cross-sectional analysis had only 36% power for the observed difference in monthly hemorrhagic deaths and 5% power for monthly blood units, indicating the study was underpowered to detect modest pre–post changes. Poisson regression analysis assessed monthly variability in blood availability across the full study period. This approach revealed that each additional blood unit was associated with a 5% lower incidence rate of hemorrhagic death, suggesting a possible dose-response relationship. While this trend did not reach statistical significance, it may still be clinically meaningful and hypothesis-generating. The persistently limited supply of blood products, the small number of monthly hemorrhagic deaths, and a post-implementation decline in live births likely contributed to the absence of a detectable change in the pre-post comparison. High transfusion rates among non-hemorrhagic deaths may reflect treatment of baseline anemia or unrecognized hemorrhage, particularly given the high prevalence of anemia in the study population. Prior studies in sub-Saharan Africa have identified multiple drivers of blood shortages, including donor scarcity, limited supplies and transport, inefficient recruitment, inappropriate transfusion, cultural barriers, stigma related to HIV status, and insufficient funding for blood services [11, 33, 34]. Future work could examine the longitudinal impact of decentralized hospital-based blood banks across multiple wards and endpoints, as well as contextual factors underlying blood availability trends.

Our secondary findings highlight that first- and second-delay barriers, including failure to recognize danger signs and delay in seeking healthcare, had stronger associations with non-hemorrhagic maternal deaths. This suggests gaps in patient knowledge and responses to complications like pre-eclampsia, infections, and indirect causes of death. Previous studies in Kenya have shown that only two-thirds of antenatal patients know even one danger sign, with most awareness centered on hemorrhagic symptoms rather than signs of other critical conditions (e.g., reduced fetal movement, abnormal vaginal discharge) [35]. Moreover, nearly half of patients lack a clear emergency plan [35]. A recent multicenter study in Nairobi similarly found that deaths from non-hemorrhagic causes (i.e., infection and eclampsia) were often linked to delayed care-seeking [36]. These findings emphasize the importance of educating patients about a broader range of danger signs and supporting them in establishing care plans.

This study has several limitations. As a single-center, retrospective review, it may not represent national trends, and data sources may contain redundant and missing information. Due to incomplete patient records, we could not collect data on clinical characteristics that might increase obstetric risks (e.g., anemia prevalence, estimated blood loss), nor on other key interventions in hemorrhage management (e.g., IV fluids, uterotonics). Furthermore, using the number of blood units dispatched to the maternity ward as a proxy for transfusions may underestimate actual transfusion events, and some deaths classified as non-hemorrhagic may have involved unrecognized hemorrhage. Finally, maternal deaths occurring outside the hospital or without completion of MDR/MDNF forms may be underreported, potentially underestimating the true burden of maternal mortality.

Conclusion

Our case-control analysis found that lack of blood products was significantly associated with hemorrhagic maternal death, while delays in seeking care were more often linked to non-hemorrhagic deaths. In the repeated cross-sectional analysis, implementation of a hospital-based blood bank did not significantly change blood supply or hemorrhagic mortality, likely due to minimal change in monthly blood units and low statistical power. These findings underscore the critical roles of reliable blood availability and timely care-seeking in improving maternal outcomes. Interventions to strengthen blood transfusion systems and expand patient education on obstetric emergency signs are essential in high-volume settings. Further research should evaluate locally adaptive blood bank models and strategies to reduce delays in emergency care access.

Acknowledgements

We thank our collaborators at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital for their approval of onsite study activities and for supporting data collection and analyses. We thank the Pathways for Innovative Transfusion Systems in Kenya (PITS- Kenya) “Bloodsafe” research program funded by the NHLBI/NIH (Strathmore IRB Approval # SU-IERC0992/21 and University of Pittsburgh IRB approval # STUDY21020040) for providing the infrastructure to conduct research activities. This international research collaboration initiative aims to identify and implement strategies to improve the availability and safety of blood transfusion services in Sub-Saharan Africa. (https://bloodsafe-research.org/)

REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization; 2019. Accessed September 15, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/327595
2. Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. The Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462-474. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7 [crossref]
3. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066-1074. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9 [crossref]
4. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323-333. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X [crossref]
5. Mclintock C, James AH. Obstetric hemorrhage. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(8):1441-1451. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04398.x [crossref]
6. Maternal Mortality Ratio (Modeled estimate, per 100,000 Live Births) – Kenya. The World Bank. Accessed December 13, 2022. https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/4622
7. Keats EC, Ngugi A, Macharia W, et al. Progress and priorities for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health in Kenya: a Countdown to 2015 country case study. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(8):e782-e795. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30246-2 [crossref]
8. Muthigani W, Ameh CA, Godia PM, et al. Saving Mothers Lives 2017: First Confidential Report into Maternal Deaths in Kenya. Published online 2017
9. Ameh CA, Meka RJ, West F, Dickinson F, Allott H, Godia P. A synthesis of clinical and health system bottlenecks to implementing new WHO postpartum hemorrhage recommendations: Secondary data analysis of the Kenya Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths 2014–2017. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;158(S1):14-22. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14270 [crossref]
10. Clarke-Deelder E, Opondo K, Achieng E, et al. Quality of care for postpartum hemorrhage: A direct observation study in referral hospitals in Kenya. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(3):e0001670. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001670 [crossref]
11. Bates I, Chapotera G, McKew S, Van Den Broek N. Maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: the contribution of ineffective blood transfusion services. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(11):1331-1339. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01866.x [crossref]
12. Gallaher JR, Mulima G, Kopp D, Shores CG, Charles AG. Consequences of centralised blood bank policies in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(2):e131-e132. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30364-3 [crossref]
13. Owolabi O, Riley T, Juma K, et al. Incidence of maternal near-miss in Kenya in 2018: findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional study in 54 referral hospitals. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15181. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72144-x [crossref]
14. Adepoju P. Blood transfusion in Kenya faces an uncertain future. The Lancet. 2019;394(10203):997-998. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32140-3 [crossref]
15. Ensuring Access to Safe Blood in Kenya Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. World Bank. Accessed February 8, 2024. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2022/05/06/ensuring-access-to-safe-blood-in-kenya-enhanced-amid-covid-19-pandemic
16. Press Statement on Blood Situation in the Country. Published online 2020
17. Mumbi L. Kenya’s blood transfusion services face collapse as World Bank’s Sh2.7 billion support ends. The Eastleigh Voice News. March 31, 2025. Accessed April 2, 2025. https://eastleighvoice.co.ke/health/132534/kenyas-blood-transfusion-services-face-collapse-as-world-banks-sh27-billion-support-ends
18. Odhiambo JN, Sartorius B. Mapping of anaemia prevalence among pregnant women in Kenya (2016–2019). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):711. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03380-2 [crossref]
19. Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women (%) – Kenya. World Bank Open Data. Accessed July 1, 2023. https://data.worldbank.org
20. Mansukhani R, Shakur-Still H, Chaudhri R, et al. Maternal anaemia and the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a cohort analysis of data from the WOMAN-2 trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(8):e1249-e1259. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00245-0 [crossref]
21. Frass KA. Postpartum hemorrhage is related to the hemoglobin levels at labor: Observational study. Alex J Med. 2015;51(4):333-337. doi:10.1016/j.ajme.2014.12.002 [crossref]
22. Thorsen VC, Sundby J, Malata A. Piecing Together the Maternal Death Puzzle through Narratives: The Three Delays Model Revisited. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(12):e52090. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052090 [crossref]
23. Muchemi OM, Gichogo AW, Mungai JG, Roka ZG. Trends in health facility based maternal mortality in Central Region, Kenya: 2008-2012. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;23:259. doi:10.11604/pamj.2016.23.259.8262 [crossref]
24. Maternal Deaths. World Health Organization. Accessed December 19, 2022. https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/4622
25. Antepartum Haemorrhage (Green-top Guideline No. 63). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Accessed December 19, 2022. https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/antepartum-haemorrhage-green-top-guideline-no-63/
26. Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(5):e106-e149. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14178 [crossref]
27. Smith H, Ameh C, Godia P, et al. Implementing Maternal Death Surveillance and Response in Kenya: Incremental Progress and Lessons Learned. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(3):345-354. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00130 [crossref]
28. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Published online 2015
29. World Health Organization, World Bank, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990-2015: Estimates from WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization; 2015. Accessed February 8, 2024. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/194254
30. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1982. 1994;38(8):1091-1110. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7 [crossref]
31. Knight HE, Self A, Kennedy SH. Why Are Women Dying When They Reach Hospital on Time? A Systematic Review of the ‘Third Delay.’ PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e63846. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063846 [crossref]
32. Tort J, Rozenberg P, Traoré M, Fournier P, Dumont A. Factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage maternal death in referral hospitals in Senegal and Mali: a cross-sectional epidemiological survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:235. doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0669-y [crossref]
33. Kipkulei J, Buziba N, Mining S. Evaluation of the Clinical Blood Transfusion Practice at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya. Published online September 25, 2019
34. Asamoah-Akuoko L, Appiah B, Delaney M, M’baya B, Tagny CT, Bates I. The status of blood supply in sub-Saharan Africa: barriers and health impact. The Lancet. 2023;402(10398):274-276. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01164-9 [crossref]
35. Mutiso SM, Qureshi Z, Kinuthia J. Birth preparedness among antenatal clients. East Afr Med J. 2008;85(6):275-283. doi:10.4314/eamj.v85i6.9625 [crossref]
36. Obare F, Liambila W, Okoro D, Ayisi R, Ochola S. Factors contributing to maternal mortality in relatively resource-endowed urban contexts of developing countries: the case of Nairobi, Kenya. Afr Popul Stud. 2016;30(3). doi:10.11564/30-3-922 [crossref]

Supplementary material

Table 4. Provider-reported contributory factors to maternal deaths

Contributory factors to mortality Sample size (%)

N=77

Checkbox or Free-Text Notes Associated with Contributory Factor
Lack of blood products 13 (16.9)
  1. Lack of blood for transfusion
  2. Unavailability of blood for transfusion when the patient was in shock
Missed antenatal care (ANC) 19 (24.6)
  1. Need for early referral antenatally to high risk clinic; community health [education] needed for such patients to seek high risk services which are readily available
  2. Ignorance of available services
  3. Avoidable factors: community health education or need for [antenatal care] visits and compliance to medication; improve [highly active antiretroviral therapy]
  4. Avoidable factors: Family planning counseling at the community level to prevent unwanted pregnancies
  5. Lack of antenatal care
  6. Non-adherence to [antiretroviral therapy]
  7. Poor antenatal clinic attendance
  8. Late realization of [congestive cardiac failure], declined cardiologist intervention
  9. Patient should have been referred to high risk clinic earlier due to comorbidity
  10. Avoidable factor: patient to have been counseled on HIV/AIDS; patient to have started [antenatal care]
  11. Patients with previous scars to attend [high risk clinic] and do obstetric scans between 32-36 weeks
Failure to recognize danger signs 28 (36.4)
  1. Failure to recognize danger signs
  2. Failure to pick up danger signs prenatally and postnatally
  3. Failure to recognize deteriorating patient; avoidable at community level
  4. Avoidable factors: health education on danger signs
Delay in seeking healthcare 16 (20.8)
  1. Delay in woman seeking healthcare
  2. Patient arrived at facility whilst critically ill
  3. Patient delivered at home and presented 5 days later
  4. Late arrival to hospital, not enough time to carry out lab tests; mother responded late, already baby was dead
  5. Long distances/ poor roads
  6. Arriving to the hospital too late when convulsing
  7. Patient presented late with sepsis 3 days after the abortion and succumbed before further interventions
  8. Late presentation to hospital
  9. Late presentation of pregnancy
  10. Failure to seek healthcare in time
  11. Patient stayed at home for three weeks with difficulty breathing before being taken to the hospital
  12. Delay in seeking medical care, late to arrive to hospital
Delay/ miscommunication from referring facility 11 (14.3)
  1. Referring facility is in position to review events and state possible avoidable factors
  2. Lack of communication/ transport between health care facilities
  3. Referring facility did not communicate to the referral facility
  4. Due to late referral from referring facility, not enough investigation, and result to determine cause of death
  5. Delay from referring facility
  6. Delayed emergency intervention by referring facility and receiving facility
  7. Patient referred without any referral order
  8. The referring facility delayed in getting an ambulance; Delay in transferring the patient
  9. death avoidable at referring facility level: early referral
  10. Avoidable factor: feedback to referring facility, improve communication between facilities
  11. Avoidable factor: long distances; death avoidable at referring facility level; health education on timely referral
Resource-constrained care at referring facility 10 (13.0)
  1. Lack of proper examination after delivery [at referral facility]; lack of skills
  2. Monitor of [preeclampsia] should be done in [referring] general hospital
  3. Referring hospital could have intervened through emergency laparotomy and transfusion; delayed emergency intervention
  4. Patient admitted with convulsion; developed sudden [difficulty in breathing] and succumbed before any intervention. Suspected magnesium toxicity
  5. Patient didn’t receive MgSO4 before referral. Patient referred without any referral order
  6. Unavailability of essential drugs from referring facility the facility realized that the drugs were expired; so patient didn’t receive MgSO4
  7. Lack of skills from referring facility; failure to make decision to do laparotomy and instead transferred patient to ICU
  8. Doctors at facility were on a strike; death avoidable at referring facility level
  9. Inadequate knowledge skills (at facility): patient received (from referral facility) in critical condition after being managed for an upper respiratory tract infection
Resource-constrained care at Nakuru Hospital 22 (28.6)
  1. Induction of labor guidelines not followed up keenly (at Nakuru facility); close follow-up of mother in labor as per guidelines
  2. Availability of bed in ICU was delayed and [pulmonary embolism’ suspected [CT pulmonary angiogram] not done
  3. Availed late, within 5 minutes of patient death; potentially avoidable factors: timely availability of… [intensive care unit] bed, senior consultation involvement in all cases of PPH, close monitoring in recovery
  4. Incorrect dose administration of prescribed drugs
  5. Delay in making exact diagnosis and recognizing change in patient condition (spO2)
  6. Outline the right dose of MgSO4
  7. [Personnel] on call should have been informed earlier before commencement of the surgery. Always optimize HB before taking patient to theatre…
  8. Parenteral anticoagulants should have been given
  9. Delayed emergency laparotomy at receiving facility (Nakuru); missed opportunity: emergency laparotomy
  10. Unavailability of ICU bed
  11. Missed an opportunity to be admitted to [intensive care unit] pending COVID test results
  12. Prolonged labor secondary to delayed interventions/ decision making.
  13. Staff shortage
  14. Shortage of staff in lab; missed opportunity: operational lab at [maternity ward] to work 24 hours
  15. Death avoidable at this facility level; Action points: early detection of features of intra-abdominal bleeding and close monitoring in [post anesthesia care unit]; functional equipment necessary for monitoring in [post anesthesia care unit]
  16. Death avoidable at this facility level
  17. Action point: protocols for patients who need anticoagulation
  18. A head CT scan was delayed; sensitizing referral facilities on use of antihypertensives [emergency hypertension]
  19. Action point: [continuing medical education] on thrombocytopenia, dialysis machine for inpatient
Poverty 2 (2.6)
  1. Poverty
Cultural or religious objections 3 (3.9)
  1. Cultural/ religious reasons/ objections
  2. Destigmatization of abortion would have made her choose a safer option for termination of pregnancy
  1. Contributory factors to death are circumstances or conditions at the personal, family, community, and health system levels that were related to a patient’s death. Information on contributory factors was abstracted from clinician-completed MDR and MDNF forms, based on clinical documentation and multidisciplinary review conclusions.
Table 5. Monthly data of blood unit distribution and maternal health outcomes

 

 

Total Units Dispatched to Maternity Ward Total Maternal Deaths Hemorrhagic Deaths Number of Live Births at Nakuru Hospital
May 2019 107 2 1 1086
August 2019 101 3 1 1121
November 2019 87 2 0 1150
February 2020 71 6 3 1128
May 2020 75 3 1 867
August 2020 81 2 1 961
November 2020 74 2 0 778
February 2021 63 2 1 954
May 2021 94 4 0 982
August 2021 90 2 1 1071
November 2021 90 0 0 1075
February 2022 89 0 0 998
May 2022 117 4 0 1051
  1. Monthly number of blood units dispatched to the maternity ward from the hospital laboratory, maternal deaths, obstetric hemorrhagic deaths, and live births occurring at Nakuru Level 6 Hospital over the study period.
JOURNAL FINANCES

The Journal of Global Surgery (ONE) is proud to transparently publish its financial model to determine the ethical publishing cost required to publish one peer reviewed article on the platform. This figure is determined by two principle calculations: the fixed running costs of the platform per article (for example annual web server fees, DOI registration), and the indivudalised stipend payments that each journal distributes to its volunteer staff to administrate, edit and review manuscripts. Each journal may set its own stipend value to the editors, peer reviewers and administrators that support the journal’s activities.

Ultimately, the final article price tag will be known as the community article processing fee (CAPC). Once the article is officially published, the CAPC price tag can be paid in full by anyone (for example the authors, an institution, a philanthropist), or the article fee can be community crowd funded, where any individual can contribute to the CAPC to reduce the price tag for everyone else. Anyone contributing as little as $0.10 will have instant early access to the article, ensuring that even if the article remains locked, anyone in the world will have the opportunity for instant, affordable access to the article. And of course, once the CAPC has been paid in full, the entire community will have open access to the article with no further costs.

PLATFORM COST PER ARTICLE1

ARTICLE STIPENDS2

COMMUNITY ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE

$16

+

$60

=

$76

Table 2: JOURNAL EDITORIAL STIPENDS – SPECIFIC COST OF EACH ARTICLE (SET BY THE Journal of Global Surgery (ONE))

Description Cost ($)
Stipend made to peer reviewer for one peer review
Note: This is the amount in dollars paid to one peer reviewer, irrespective of whether article is accepted or rejected. *Assumption is that one article will have two independent peer reviews
10
Stipend made to editor per article undergoing active peer review
Note: This is the amount in dollars paid to the editor, irrespective of whether article is accepted or rejected.
10
Stipend made for administration and type setting per accepted article
Using our platform, the automated typesetting process is extremely efficient with instant publication options
15
Bitcoin Cash payment given to authors to allow them instant access to their own article. 2
Final journal specific running costs based on manuscript acceptance rate of 70%*
*based on estimation
60

Figures last updated: July 27, 2021 at 7:10 pm

Article creation cost: $76

Community payments to date: $76.00

Remaining payments for open access: $0.00

The following payments have been made to help pay for this article:

User Amount Payment method Date
Anonymous $10.00 Bitcoin Cash October 12, 2025 at 11:22 am
Anonymous $1.00 Bitcoin Cash October 12, 2025 at 11:22 am
Anonymous $10.00 PayPal October 12, 2025 at 1:36 pm
Anonymous $1.00 Bitcoin Cash October 12, 2025 at 10:52 pm
emergent_reasons $5.00 Bitcoin Cash October 13, 2025 at 12:59 am
The BCH Podcast $5.00 Bitcoin Cash October 13, 2025 at 2:04 am
Anonymous $5.00 Bitcoin Cash October 13, 2025 at 5:53 am
Omar $4.00 Bitcoin Cash October 13, 2025 at 12:32 pm
devperate $3.00 Bitcoin Cash October 13, 2025 at 9:54 pm
Anonymous $20.00 PayPal October 13, 2025 at 10:49 pm
CashStamps $5.00 Bitcoin Cash October 14, 2025 at 4:09 am
Anonymous $7.00 PayPal October 14, 2025 at 5:36 pm

Cite this article

Select the citation style to generate the format below.

Export citation (includes abstract)

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.


Number of abstract only views: 54
Number of full article views: 2538
Number of PDF views: 138