The Practice of Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery in Rural Cameroon, A Retrospective Review.

Journal Of Global Surgery (ONE), Volume. 1, Issue: 2, pp. 165-171
The Practice of Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery in Rural Cameroon, A Retrospective Review.
George F.F Ngock, Baptist Institute of Health Sciences, Mbingo Baptist Hospital., Cameroon
ngamngoin@yahoo.com
Blessing N Ngam, Baptist Institute of Health Sciences, Mbingo Baptist Hospital., Cameroon
Ngueping M.J TchindeBaptist Institute of Health Sciences, Mbingo Baptist Hospital., Cameroon

Western Africa Cameroon Paediatric surgery

Keywords: Pediatric Laparoscopy, outcomes, sub-Saharan Africa, Cost of laparoscopy
SUBMITTED: 28.05.2025 PEER REVIEWED IN: Kenya, United States PUBLISHED ONLINE: 28.08.2025
9 MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTED $76 TO MAKE THIS ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS FOR EVERYONE! THANK YOU
ABSTRACT

Background Laparoscopy equipment is now more readily available in sub-Saharan Africa than previously reported. However, little is known about its uptake and outcomes, especially in the pediatric age group. We aimed to present our experience with pediatric laparoscopy in a limited-resource setting. Method This retrospective review of operating room, inpatient, and electronic medical records at Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Cameroon (January 2018 – December 2024), involved all pediatric laparoscopic cases. The analysed data included demographics, indications, procedures, surgery time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion rates, hospital stay days, and costs. Results A total of 167 laparoscopic cases were performed during the study period. This included 74.9% males and 25.1% females with ages ranging from 6 weeks to 20 years and a mean age of 5.5 years ± 5.3 SD. The most common indications for laparoscopy were cryptorchidism (28.1%), Hirschsprung’s disease (18.6%), appendicitis and its complications (7.8%), and pyloric stenosis (5.9%). 74.9% of cases were therapeutic, while 25.1% were diagnostic, with a conversion rate of 13.7%. 4.8% of patients sustained intraoperative complications, while 11.4% of patients developed post-op complications. The mean surgery time was 97.2 minutes ± 62.6 SD.  The patients who developed postoperative complications were most likely to be in surgery for > 120 minutes, P=0.001. The median hospital stay was 3 days. The surgery fees ranged from 256.6 to 2,052.4 I$PPP, while the cost of hospitalization ranged from 494.8 to 5,497.8 I$PPP. Post Op complications resulted in longer hospital stays (P<0.001) and increased cost (P<0.001) Conclusion: The scope of laparoscopic surgery was broad, and the outcomes and cost were comparable to those reported in the region.

Introduction

Laparoscopy is an established practice in developed countries but is not widely utilized in sub-Saharan Africa.  Resource constraints and the absence of sustainable training models are among the main reasons hampering the uptake of laparoscopy in this region[1,2]. However, several pioneering attempts have been made to adapt this less morbid surgical technique to low-resource settings, with reports on its feasibility and safety in the region [3–6].  To highlight the feasibility of complex pediatric laparoscopic surgery in the region, we sought to report our experiences with pediatric laparoscopic surgery at Mbingo Baptist Hospital (MBH), a rural hospital in Northwest Cameroon.

Methodology

Study design

This retrospective descriptive study involved reviewing operating room (OR) records of all pediatric operations performed at MBH from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2024. All pediatric patients who had laparoscopy during the 7-year study period were identified, and their charts and electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed. The variables extracted included age, sex, diagnosis, procedure, surgery time, intraoperative complications, conversion rates, postoperative complications, hospital stay days, procedure and hospital stay costs. Surgery time was considered as the time from incision to skin closure. Procedure cost was the cost of the surgery, including anesthesia consumables. The cost of healthcare was evaluated from the provider’s perspective, using a top-down approach that considers remuneration, consumables, equipment, maintenance, and other compulsory hospital operational costs for inpatient care. Details on the direct and indirect costs were extracted from the hospital’s billing records on EMR. However, donated equipment and infrastructure mitigate the indirect cost to the patients, hence underreporting the indirect cost to each patient. To ensure international comparability, the costs were adjusted from XAF to international dollars using purchasing power parity exchange rates for 2021.

We entered data into a database in Microsoft Excel 2016, de-identified, and coded it. The data was analyzed using Excel 2016 and SPSS v25. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare two medians. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The association between hospital length of stay and overall cost was compared using a Pearson correlation.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Board IRB.

Study setting and participants

Mbingo Baptist Hospital is a rural tertiary hospital in Northwest Cameroon. The pediatric surgery service performed 2,638 surgeries during the 7-year study period, averaging about 377 major cases yearly. There is a pediatric surgery team that includes one pediatric surgeon, two pediatric anesthetists, two anesthesiologists, scrub nurses, and a dedicated pediatric operating room, by kidsOR. Although the general surgery team operates on pediatric surgery patients in the absence of the pediatric surgeon, 99% of the laparoscopic cases were performed by the lone pediatric surgeon, assisted mostly by surgery residents.

Results

One hundred and sixty-seven out of 2,638 (6.3%) pediatric surgeries were done via laparoscopy during the 7-year study period. This included 125 (74.9%) males and 42 (25.1%) females, with a male: female ratio of 3:1. Their ages ranged from 6 weeks to 20 years, with a mean age of 5.5 years ± 5.3 SD (Table 1).

A wide variety of pathologies were managed via laparoscopy, but the most common were cryptorchidism (non-palpable undescended testes) (28.1%), Hirschsprung (18.6%), appendicitis and its complications (7.8%), and pyloric stenosis (5.9%) (Table 2)

74.9% (125/167) of cases were therapeutic, while 25.1% 942/167) were diagnostic. 13.7% (22/167) of cases were converted to open, while 86.8% (145/167) were completed laparoscopically. The most common indications for conversion to open were technical difficulties and visceral injuries (Table 3).

4.8% (8/167) of patients sustained intraoperative complications. 62.5% (5/8) were converted to open, while 37.5% (3/8) were managed laparoscopically. 11.4% (19/167) of patients developed post-op complications. It is worth noting that some patients developed more than one post-op complication. 1.2% (2/167) of patients where hospitalised for >28days following surgery (Table 4).

Surgery time ranged from 10 to 380 minutes, with an average operative time of 97.2 minutes ± 62.6 SD (median=90 minutes).  Patients who developed postoperative complications were most likely to have been in surgery for more than 120 minutes, P = 0.001. Hospital stays ranged from 0 to 30 days post-op, with a median stay of 3 days (Table 5)

The cost of laparoscopic surgery ranged from 256.6 to 2,052.4 international dollars(I$PPP), with a median of 769.6 I$PPP. Without conversions to open surgeries, the average cost was 811.3I$PPP, and when converted to open surgery, the average cost was 897.9I$PPP. However, the cost of hospital stay ranged from 494.8 to 5,497.8I$PPP, with a median of 1,197.0I$PPP.

Table I: Age and sex distributions of the patients
Variable Categories Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Age (years)  
  <5 94 56.29
5-9.99 31 18.56
10-14.99 30 17.96
15-20 12 7.18
 Total 167 100.00
 
Gender  
  Female 42 25.14
Male 125 74.86
 Total 167 100.00
Table II: Indications of laparoscopic surgery
Indication Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
 
Abdominal mass 4 2.40
Abscess 4 2.40
Achalasia 3 1.80
Acute abdominal pain 4 2.40
Adhesions 5 2.99
Appendicitis 13 7.78
Anorectal Malformations (ARM) 7 4.19
Cryptorchidism 47 28.14
Diaphragmatic hernia 1 0.60
Disorder of sexual differentiation 7 4.19
Esophageal injury/stricture 5 2.99
Fecal impaction 1 0.60
Gastroesophageal reflux disease 1 0.60
Hematochezia 1 0.60
Hirschsprung 31 18.56
Hypertrophied terminal ileum mucosa 1 0.60
Intussusception 3 1.80
Midgut malrotation without volvulus 6 3.59
Midgut malrotation with volvulus 1 0.60
Posterior Urethral Valve (PUV) 1 0.60
Pyloric stenosis 10 5.99
Rectal prolapse 1 0.60
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) 1 0.60
Tuberculosis (TB) 1 0.60
Trauma 1 0.60
Urogenital sinus 3 1.79
Varicocele 1 0.60
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction or malposition 3 1.80
 Total 167 100.00
Table III: Case Characteristics
Variable Categories Frequency   Percentage (%)
Procedure, N=167  
  Diagnostic 42 25.14
Therapeutic 125 74.86
Conversion, N=167  
  No 145 86.8
Yes 22 13.17
Reasons for conversion, n=22  
  Ischemic bowel from volvulus 1 4.55
Pyloric perforation 2 9.10
Technical reasons 16 72.72
Enterotomy 3 13.63
Technical reasons for conversion to open n=16  
  Malrotation 5 31.25
  Appendiceal/pelvic abscess 3 18.75
  Severe bowel dilation 4 25
  Adhesions 2 12.5
  Subhepatic mass 1 6.25
  Hematochezia 1 6.26
 
Table IV: Intraoperative and post-operative outcomes. (SSSI: superficial surgical site infection, SSI surgical site infection)
Variable Categories Frequency N=167 Percentage (%)
Intraoperative complication
  Bladder injury not recognized 1 0.6
enterotomy 4 2.4
gastric perforation 1 0.6
malignant hyperthermia 1 0.6
vas injury 1 0.6
  None       159      95.2
Postop complication
Anastomosis breakdown 1 0.6
Laparoscopic enterotomy repair breakdown 1 0.6
Abdominal SSSI 2 1.2
Pelvic abscess (collection/recollection) 7 4.2
Port site hernia 1 0.6
Port site SSI 1 0.6
Anal wound breakdown 5 3.0
Abdominal wound dehiscence 1 0.6
Death 4 2.4
Hospital stay (days)  
  <8 115 68.86
  8-14 27 16.17
  15-21 5 2.99
  22-28 4 2.40
  >28 2 1.20
  Missing Data 14 8.38
Table V: Surgery duration and relationship to post-op complications
Length of procedure(min) Frequency N=167 Percentage % Post-op complication? P value
        Yes No  
      Median length 180 90 0.003
<61 37   22.2   0 37(25.00)  
61-120 55   33.0   3(15.79) 52(35.14)  
>120 20   11.9   6(31.58) 14(9.46) 0.007
Missing data 55   32.9   10(52.63) 43(30.41)  
Total 167   100   19 148  
Discussion

Despite the well-documented benefits of laparoscopic surgery, its adoption remains remarkably low and underreported in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in the pediatric population. A recent multicentre study highlighted that pediatric laparoscopy is still a rarity, with significant disparities in its practice across the East, Central, and Southern African (COSECSA) region[7]. A major reported limitation of this research was the lack of data from several key institutions, underscoring the urgent need for comprehensive documentation. Our study aims to bridge this gap by sharing our valuable experience with pediatric laparoscopic surgery, emphasizing its feasibility and critical importance for enhancing pediatric surgical care in the region.

Our patient population was predominantly male, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. Even though they had a younger patient population, Lukman Olajide et al reported a similar gender distribution [6]. The most common indications for laparoscopic surgery were cryptorchidism, Hirschsprung’s disease, acute appendicitis, Pyloric stenosis, and anorectal malformations (ARM). Cryptorchidism is a diagnosis of the male gender[8], and ARM, Hirschsprung, and pyloric stenosis are more common in males[9–11], which could explain the gender distribution in our patients.

All laparoscopic cases were performed with an intent-to-treat approach, although 25.1% ended at diagnostic procedures. Of this subset, the most common indications were disorders of sexual differentiation (DSD), Malrotation, and cryptorchidism. Other minor indications included malfunctioning VP shunt, adhesions, abdominal pain of unclear aetiology, intrabdominal abscesses, tuberculosis, trauma, intra-abdominal tumours, etc.  Laparoscopy is useful in the evaluation of patients with DSD as it allows for the identification of mullerian structures and inspection of gonadal morphology[12] as well as biopsies and possible excision of germ cell tumours[13,14]. Though Huntington et al report shorter hospital stays and fewer post-op complications with laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure[15], the superiority of laparoscopic over open Ladd’s is still controversial[16]. Isani et al report a 46.6% conversion to open in the cohort who had laparoscopic Ladd’s, alongside longer operating time[17], and more conversions to open Ladd’s have also been reported at the initial phase of the surgical experience[16]. This highlights the long learning curve required in performing laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure and the importance of surgical expertise and experience. Furthermore, laparoscopy is considered the gold standard for assessing the presence and location of non-palpable testes with 100% accuracy[18].

Of the subset who got therapeutic procedures, 13.2% were converted to open, mostly due to technical reasons that precluded the continuation of safe laparoscopic surgery. Technical reasons included complex pathologies like malrotation that require more expertise, abscesses with friable bowel or phlegmons, severely dilated small bowel, and dense intrabdominal adhesions. Three patients had enterotomies, 2 patients had pyloric perforation during the pyloromyotomy, and 1 patient had ischaemic bowel on laparoscopy. The pyloric perforations resulted from malfunctioning instruments and the unavailability of a proper myotome. The common causes of conversion to open described in the literature include dense adhesions[19], intraoperative complications[20,21], technical difficulties, and equipment malfunction (22), complex pathologies(19,22), and surgeons’ expertise(23). Consistent with our study, Saleh et al. reported technical difficulties as their most common reason for conversion[22].

We observed both intraoperative and postoperative complications. Eight patients had intraoperative complications, including bowel injury, vas injury, and one bladder injury that was only realized in the postoperative period when the patient developed a pelvic collection. This was subsequently drained via open surgery, and the bladder injury was repaired. One patient developed malignant hyperthermia intra-op, which was discovered late. Cases like this led to the purchase and mandatory use of ETCO2 monitors in the pediatric operating room. Regarding postoperative complications, 19 patients developed postoperative complications, including superficial, deep, and organ space infections and coloanal anastomosis breakdown. Only 2 (1.2%) postoperative complications were directly linked to laparoscopy. The first was a severely malnourished patient who developed a port site hernia post-Heller myotomy and fundoplication for achalasia, and the other developed a port site infection and anal wound breakdown post-laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for a high malformation. Also, we observed a mortality of 2.4%. The first death was from malignant hyperthermia, and another was from sepsis following an infected VPS that migrated into the bowel. One had a diagnostic laparoscopy with a diagnosis of malrotation and chronic volvulus, had an open Ladd’s procedure, and died from severe acute malnutrition. Meanwhile, the last patient died from sepsis following a concealed coloanal anastomotic leak post-laparoscopic-assisted emergency colostomy pull-through for a gangrenous stoma prolapse in Hirschsprung disease. Increased postoperative morbidity and mortality are experienced in emergency procedures when compared to elective ones[24]. Longer procedures, greater than 120 minutes, were more likely to be associated with a postoperative complication. This is consistent with literature, where prolonged operative time has been associated with increased postoperative complications[25,26]. Longer operative times were more likely to be linked to the case complexities than to surgical inefficiency or equipment malfunction.

Furthermore, the median cost of hospitalization was 1,197.0I$PPP, which is similar to other reports from the region [27–29]. Patients who developed complications and stayed longer in the hospital incurred higher hospital bills. This is consistent with the higher financial burden incurred in patients who developed complications, as reported by Parker et al[30].

This study has several limitations that must be acknowledged. First, the lack of comprehensive documentation to accurately classify surgical complications according to a standardized classification system, along with insufficient data on operative duration, introduces potential bias in the reported outcomes. Additionally, the artificially lowered cost resulting from donated equipment further limits the generalizability of the cost reported in this study

Conclusion

Pediatric laparoscopic surgery at MBH encompassed a comprehensive spectrum of both fundamental and complex procedures, demonstrating comparable challenges, costs, and outcomes to those documented in the existing scientific literature.

REFERENCES
1. Loveland J, Numanoglu A, Hay SA. Pediatric minimally invasive surgery in Africa: limitations and current situation. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. 2012 May 1;21(2):160–3. [crossref]
2. Nyundo M, Umugwaneza N, Bekele A, Chikoya L, Gashegu J, Detry O. Assessment of resource capacity and barriers to effective practice of laparoscopic surgery in training hospitals affiliated with the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA). Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5121–8. [crossref]
3. Talabi AO, Adisa AO, Adefehinti O, Sowande OA, Etonyeaku AC, Adejuyigbe O. Early experience with laparoscopic surgery in children in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015;12(1):29–32. [crossref]
4. Ekwunife C, Emegoakor C, Anyanwu S, Chianakwana G. Pioneering laparoscopic surgery in South-eastern Nigeria: A two-center general surgery experience. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences. 2012 Jan 1;9:75. [crossref]
5. Adisa AO, Lawal OO, Alatise OI, Adesunkanmi AR. An audit of laparoscopic surgeries in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2011;30(4):273–6.
6. Abdur-Rahman LO, Bamigbola KT, Nasir AA, Oyinloye AO, Abdulraheem NT, Oyedepo OO, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic surgery in North-Central Nigeria: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Clinical Sciences. 2016 Dec;13(4):158. [crossref]
7. Yankunze Y, Mwachiro MM, Lando JO, Bachheta N, Mangaoang D, Bekele A, et al. Laparoscopy experience in East, Central, and Southern Africa: insights from operative case volume analysis. Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug 1;38(8):4415–21. [crossref]
8. Nguyen V, Ngo L, Jaqua EE. Cryptorchidism (Undescended Testicle). Am Fam Physician. 2023 Oct;108(4):378–85.
9. Black AJ, Lu DY, Yefet LS, Baird R. Sex differences in surgically correctable congenital anomalies: A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2020 May;55(5):811–20. [crossref]
10. Bergeron KF, Silversides DW, Pilon N. The developmental genetics of Hirschsprung’s disease. Clin Genet. 2013 Jan;83(1):15–22. [crossref]
11. Obaid YY, Toubasi AA, Albustanji FH, Al-Qawasmeh AR. Perinatal risk factors for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Mar;58(3):458–66. [crossref]
12. Steven M, O’Toole S, Lam JPH, MacKinlay GA, Cascio S. Laparoscopy versus ultrasonography for the evaluation of Mullerian structures in children with complex disorders of sex development. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012 Dec;28(12):1161–4. [crossref]
13. Chertin B, Koulikov D, Alberton J, Hadas-Halpern I, Reissman P, Farkas A. The use of laparoscopy in intersex patients. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 May;22(5):405–8. [crossref]
14. Wünsch L, Holterhus PM, Wessel L, Hiort O. Patients with disorders of sex development (DSD) at risk of gonadal tumour development: management based on laparoscopic biopsy and molecular diagnosis. BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E958-965. [crossref]
15. Huntington JT, Lopez JJ, Mahida JB, Ambeba EJ, Asti L, Deans KJ, et al. Comparing laparoscopic versus open Ladd’s procedure in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jul;52(7):1128–31. [crossref]
16. Arnaud AP, Suply E, Eaton S, Blackburn SC, Giuliani S, Curry JI, et al. Laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure for malrotation in infants and children is still a controversial approach. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Sep;54(9):1843–7. [crossref]
17. Isani MA, Schlieve C, Jackson J, Elizee M, Asuelime G, Rosenberg D, et al. Is less more? Laparoscopic versus open Ladd’s procedure in children with malrotation. J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:351–6. [crossref]
18. Kolon TF, Herndon CDA, Baker LA, Baskin LS, Baxter CG, Cheng EY, et al. Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):337–45. [crossref]
19. Mege D, Michelassi F. Laparoscopy in Crohn Disease: Learning Curve and Current Practice. Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):317–24. [crossref]
20. Ndong A, Diallo AC, Rouhi AD, Diao ML, Yi W, Tendeng JN, et al. Factors associated with conversion in laparoscopic surgery in a low-resource setting: a single-center prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):8072–9. [crossref]
21. Halls MC, Cipriani F, Berardi G, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Alzoubi M, et al. Conversion for Unfavorable Intraoperative Events Results in Significantly Worse Outcomes During Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Lessons Learned From a Multicenter Review of 2861 Cases. Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):1051–7. [crossref]
22. Saleh M, Pascual F, Ghallab M, Wu AGR, Chin KM, Ratti F, et al. Factors Associated with and Impact of Open Conversion in Laparoscopic and Robotic Minor Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study of 10,541 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;31(9):5615–30.
23. Nassar AHM, Zanati HE, Ng HJ, Khan KS, Wood C. Open conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration: subspecialisation safely reduces the conversion rates. Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):550–8. [crossref]
24. Kassahun WT, Babel J, Mehdorn M. Assessing differences in surgical outcomes following emergency abdominal exploration for complications of elective surgery and high-risk primary emergencies. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):1349. [crossref]
25. Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B, Sadeghirad B, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, et al. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Surgical Research. 2018 Sep 1;229:134–44. [crossref]
26. Jeon BG, Kim HJ, Jung KH, Kim SW, Park JS, Kim KH, et al. Prolonged operative time in laparoscopic appendectomy: Predictive factors and outcomes. International Journal of Surgery. 2016 Dec 1;36:225–32. [crossref]
27. Silverstein A, Costas-Chavarri A, Gakwaya MR, Lule J, Mukhopadhyay S, Meara JG, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis at Rwanda Military Hospital. World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1225–33. [crossref]
28. Buitrago G, Junca E, Eslava-Schmalbach J, Caycedo R, Pinillos P, Leal LC. Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Costs Associated with Laparoscopic Appendectomy in a Middle-Income Country with Universal Health Coverage. World J Surg. 2019 Jan;43(1):67–74. [crossref]
29. Otoki K, Simel I, Moenga D, Chesang P, Parker RK. Laparoscopic appendectomy improves outcomes and reduces costs in rural Kenya. Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb 6; [crossref]
30. Parker RK, Otoki K, Many HR, Parker AS, Shrime MG. The costs of complications after emergency gastrointestinal surgery in Kenya. Surgery. 2022 Nov 1;172(5):1401–6 [crossref]

JOURNAL FINANCES

The Journal of Global Surgery (ONE) is proud to transparently publish its financial model to determine the ethical publishing cost required to publish one peer reviewed article on the platform. This figure is determined by two principle calculations: the fixed running costs of the platform per article (for example annual web server fees, DOI registration), and the indivudalised stipend payments that each journal distributes to its volunteer staff to administrate, edit and review manuscripts. Each journal may set its own stipend value to the editors, peer reviewers and administrators that support the journal’s activities.

Ultimately, the final article price tag will be known as the community article processing fee (CAPC). Once the article is officially published, the CAPC price tag can be paid in full by anyone (for example the authors, an institution, a philanthropist), or the article fee can be community crowd funded, where any individual can contribute to the CAPC to reduce the price tag for everyone else. Anyone contributing as little as $0.10 will have instant early access to the article, ensuring that even if the article remains locked, anyone in the world will have the opportunity for instant, affordable access to the article. And of course, once the CAPC has been paid in full, the entire community will have open access to the article with no further costs.

PLATFORM COST PER ARTICLE1

ARTICLE STIPENDS2

COMMUNITY ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE

$16

+

$60

=

$76

Table 2: JOURNAL EDITORIAL STIPENDS – SPECIFIC COST OF EACH ARTICLE (SET BY THE Journal of Global Surgery (ONE))

Description Cost ($)
Stipend made to peer reviewer for one peer review
Note: This is the amount in dollars paid to one peer reviewer, irrespective of whether article is accepted or rejected. *Assumption is that one article will have two independent peer reviews
10
Stipend made to editor per article undergoing active peer review
Note: This is the amount in dollars paid to the editor, irrespective of whether article is accepted or rejected.
10
Stipend made for administration and type setting per accepted article
Using our platform, the automated typesetting process is extremely efficient with instant publication options
15
Bitcoin Cash payment given to authors to allow them instant access to their own article. 2
Final journal specific running costs based on manuscript acceptance rate of 70%*
*based on estimation
60

Figures last updated: July 27, 2021 at 7:10 pm

Article creation cost: $76

Community payments to date: $76.00

Remaining payments for open access: $0.00

The following payments have been made to help pay for this article:

User Amount Payment method Date
Anonymous $2.00 Bitcoin Cash August 28, 2025 at 3:39 am
emergent_reasons $5.00 Bitcoin Cash August 28, 2025 at 7:26 am
Anonymous $10.00 Bitcoin Cash August 28, 2025 at 10:04 am
The Bitcoin Cash Podcast $5.00 Bitcoin Cash August 28, 2025 at 11:25 am
devperate $10.00 Bitcoin Cash August 28, 2025 at 12:45 pm
Anonymous $6.00 Bitcoin Cash August 29, 2025 at 5:45 am
Anonymous $15.00 PayPal August 29, 2025 at 10:28 am
Anonymous $20.00 Bitcoin Cash August 31, 2025 at 3:52 am
Omar $3.00 Bitcoin Cash August 31, 2025 at 7:25 am

Cite this article

Select the citation style to generate the format below.

Export citation (includes abstract)

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.


Number of abstract only views: 118
Number of full article views: 1389
Number of PDF views: 117